A document reportedly filed by the Rapid Action Force (RAF) has revealed that pellet rounds were fired during the July 20 protest march in Delhi, raising new questions about the force used during the crackdown. The entry contradicts earlier police denials and has intensified scrutiny over the actions of the security forces. The issue is now under judicial review, with multiple petitions demanding accountability and a thorough investigation (thehindu.com).
The revelation has sparked renewed public concern over the use of non-lethal weapons during protests, particularly in a context where tensions have been high. The document, which appears to be a general diary entry, suggests that the RAF may have used pellet rounds to disperse demonstrators, a claim that has not been officially confirmed by authorities. This has led to calls for transparency and an independent inquiry into the incident (thehindu.com).
Legal challenges are now mounting against the government, with activists and lawyers arguing that the use of such force could constitute a violation of human rights. The case highlights ongoing debates over police conduct during mass protests and the need for clearer guidelines on the use of force. As the courts consider the petitions, the situation remains under close watch by both the public and civil society groups.
