Supreme Court Justice Surya Kant has strongly criticized the Indian Bar Council (BCI) for its decision to freeze enrollment at NALSAR, a prestigious legal research institute in Hyderabad. The order, issued in response to a petition by students, has sparked controversy over academic freedom and institutional autonomy.
The BCI had imposed the freeze on enrollment for the 2026 batch, citing concerns over the institution's compliance with legal education standards. Justice Kant, however, argued that the move infringes on students' right to protest and express their views. During a hearing, he emphasized that the BCI's actions were overreaching and undermined the democratic rights of students.
The court has ordered that no coercive measures be taken against NALSAR students or its administration. It has also requested an affidavit from the BCI explaining the rationale behind the circular. The case highlights tensions between regulatory bodies and academic institutions in India.
The dispute has drawn attention to the broader implications of regulatory control over higher education. Students and faculty at NALSAR have expressed support for Justice Kant's stance, calling for greater transparency and accountability from the BCI.
