The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ruled that an affidavit of desistance — a sworn statement by a victim withdrawing a complaint — cannot be used to dismiss a trafficking case. In a decision released on February 19, 2026, the court labeled such affidavits “highly suspect,” emphasizing their potential misuse in cases involving human trafficking. The ruling comes amid ongoing legal battles surrounding the prosecution of former President Rodrigo Duterte, who faces charges related to extrajudicial killings.
The court’s decision underscores the need for stricter scrutiny of evidence in trafficking cases, particularly those involving vulnerable victims. Legal experts have noted that the ruling could impact how cases are handled in the future, reinforcing the principle that victims’ statements should not be dismissed lightly. Meanwhile, Duterte’s defense team has called on the International Criminal Court to refile charges against the former leader, arguing that prosecutors failed to provide detailed information about the allegations.
The ruling highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding high-profile cases in the Philippines. As the ICC continues to review Duterte’s case, the Supreme Court’s stance on victim affidavits adds another layer to the ongoing legal discourse. The decision may also influence how future trafficking cases are prosecuted, ensuring greater protection for victims.
