Sixteen years after Kenya adopted its 2010 Constitution, debates continue over its impact on governance and daily life. The document introduced significant changes, including a shift toward devolution and greater citizen participation. However, critics argue that these reforms have not translated into tangible improvements for many Kenyans. Political analysts suggest that while the constitution introduced new mechanisms for accountability, it has also allowed entrenched power structures to persist under a different name. The ongoing discussion reflects a broader uncertainty about the effectiveness of constitutional change in addressing systemic challenges. As the country moves forward, the legacy of the 2010 Constitution remains a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.